Understanding DNA Quality Metrics

ENTM201L - General Entomology Laboratory | UC Riverside

Listen to Theory Module

0:00 / 0:00

Listen to this module while following along with the text below, or download for offline study.

Understanding DNA Quality Metrics

Concentration, Purity, and Integrity for Molecular Biology

ENTM201L - Lab Theory


Why DNA Quality Matters

You have successfully extracted DNA from mosquito tissue. You have quantified it with Qubit and assessed purity with NanoDrop. Now comes the critical question: Is this DNA good enough for my downstream applications?

Not all DNA is created equal. DNA with the "correct" concentration might still fail in PCR if it is contaminated with inhibitors. DNA with perfect purity ratios might still produce poor sequencing results if it is fragmented. Understanding the three pillars of DNA quality - concentration, purity, and integrity - allows you to predict success, troubleshoot failures, and optimize your experimental workflow.


The Three Pillars of DNA Quality

1. Concentration: How Much DNA?

Measurement: Qubit fluorometry (ng/µL) Why it matters: Target for Lab:

2. Purity: What Else is Present?

Measurement: NanoDrop spectrophotometry (A260/A280 and A260/A230 ratios) Why it matters: Targets:

3. Integrity: Is DNA Intact or Fragmented?

Measurement: Gel electrophoresis (visual assessment of fragment size) Why it matters: Targets:

PCR Template Requirements

Q5 High-Fidelity Polymerase Specifications

The PCR enzyme we use in ENTM201L has specific optimal conditions:

Template DNA Amount: Template DNA Quality: Why these numbers?

The target gene (COI) exists as single copy per mitochondrial genome. Mosquito cells contain hundreds to thousands of mitochondria, so each cell has hundreds of COI copies. But the nuclear genome is huge (200 million base pairs), meaning statistically, at low DNA amounts, primers might not find target.

Calculation:
Mosquito genome size: 200 Mb = 200,000,000 bp

Average genome mass: 200 Mb × 650 Da/bp × 1.67×10⁻²⁴ g/Da = 217 femtograms

Number of genomes in 25 ng DNA: 25 ng ÷ 217 fg = 115,000 genomes

Number of COI targets (at 500 mitochondria/cell): 115,000 × 500 = 57,500,000 copies

This is enough for robust PCR. Below 10 ng, you risk having too few target molecules for efficient exponential amplification.

Common PCR Inhibitors in DNA Extractions

InhibitorSourceMechanismSolution
ProteinsIncomplete Proteinase K digestionBind polymerase or DNADilute template 1:2; add BSA
Salts (NaCl, guanidine)Lysis/binding buffersDisrupt Mg²⁺ cofactor bindingDilute template 1:5; extra washes
EDTAElution buffer (if present)Chelates Mg²⁺, essential cofactorUse Tris-only elution buffer
EthanolIncomplete dryingDenatures polymeraseDry beads completely; do not over-dry
MelaninMosquito eye pigmentsAbsorbs UV, minor PCR inhibitionDilute template 1:2
Humic acidsSoil-preserved specimensBind polymeraseUse polymerase with BSA included
HemeBlood-fed mosquitoesOxidative damage to dNTPsExtract before blood meal digestion
Rule of Thumb: If PCR fails despite adequate DNA concentration and good purity ratios, dilute template 1:2 or 1:5. Inhibitors dilute linearly, but DNA target concentration decreases linearly too, so there is an optimal dilution that maximizes signal while minimizing inhibition.

Comparing Magnetic Beads vs. Column Extraction

In Lab, your class is comparing two DNA extraction methods. Understanding their strengths and weaknesses helps you interpret results.

Method Comparison

FeatureMagnetic Beads (BioDynami)Column (Zymo)
PrincipleDNA binds beads in high salt; release in low saltDNA binds silica membrane; elute in low salt
Mechanical stressMinimal (no centrifugation)High (14,000×g spin through membrane)
Expected fragment size50-150 kb10-50 kb
Yield from 1 mosquito20-60 ng/µL (in 50 µL)15-40 ng/µL (in 50 µL)
A260/A280 ratio1.80-1.951.75-1.90
A260/A230 ratio1.9-2.21.8-2.0
Time required75 min90 min
Cost per sample~$3~$5
Hands-on stepsMany (8+ pipetting steps)Fewer (5-6 pipetting steps)
Automation potentialEasy (magnetic robots)Difficult (centrifuge integration)
Best forLong-read sequencing, genome assemblyStandard PCR, Sanger sequencing

Why Fragment Size Differs

Magnetic bead extraction preserves HMW DNA because: Column extraction fragments DNA because: When does it matter?

Yield Comparison

Expected yields vary by preservation method:

PreservationMagnetic Beads (ng/µL)Column (ng/µL)Difference
-80°C Frozen40-6030-50Beads ~20% higher
95% Ethanol25-4520-35Beads ~15% higher
Silica Gel15-3510-25Beads ~30% higher
70% Ethanol8-205-15Beads ~40% higher
Why beads yield more:

Decision Trees

"My DNA is Too Dilute" - What to Do?

Scenario: Qubit reads 3 ng/µL, need 10-50 ng/µL for optimal PCR Decision Tree:

1. Can you concentrate the sample?

- Yes → SpeedVac concentration (remove water by vacuum)

- Concentrate 50 µL to 15 µL = 3× concentration = 9 ng/µL

- Risk: Concentrates inhibitors too

- Yes → DNA precipitation

- Add sodium acetate + ethanol, pellet, resuspend in smaller volume

- Removes some salts during wash

- No → Proceed with more template volume (see below)

2. Can you use more template volume?

- Standard PCR: 1 µL template in 25 µL reaction

- Low DNA: Use 3-5 µL template in 25 µL reaction

- At 3 ng/µL, 5 µL provides 15 ng total (acceptable)

- Trade-off: More volume means more potential inhibitors

3. Can you increase PCR cycles?

- Standard: 30-35 cycles

- Low template: 35-40 cycles

- Each extra cycle doubles product (in theory)

- Trade-off: More cycles = more non-specific amplification

4. Should you re-extract?

- If A260/A280 and A260/A230 are good → Try PCR first

- If purity ratios are poor → Re-extract recommended

- If DNA <1 ng/µL → Definitely re-extract

"My Purity Ratios Are Low" - What to Do?

Scenario 1: Low A260/A280 (protein contamination)
Decision Path:

├─ Is A260/A280 >1.7?

│ ├─ YES → Acceptable for mosquito DNA, proceed to PCR

│ └─ NO → High protein contamination

│ ├─ Can you dilute? (If DNA conc >50 ng/µL)

│ │ └─ Dilute 1:2 with elution buffer

│ ├─ Can you add cleanup step?

│ │ └─ Zymo DNA Clean & Concentrator (removes proteins)

│ └─ Should you re-extract?

│ └─ Use more Proteinase K, longer incubation

Scenario 2: Low A260/A230 (salt contamination)
Decision Path:

├─ Is A260/A230 >1.8?

│ ├─ YES → Acceptable, proceed to PCR

│ └─ NO → High salt contamination

│ ├─ Can you dilute? (If DNA conc >50 ng/µL)

│ │ └─ Dilute 1:5 (dilutes salts more than proteins)

│ ├─ Can you add extra wash?

│ │ └─ Add 80% ethanol, vortex, magnetic separation, dry

│ └─ Should you precipitate?

│ └─ Ethanol precipitation removes salts effectively


Dilution Calculations: C₁V₁ = C₂V₂

The Formula

C₁V₁ = C₂V₂

Where:

C₁ = Initial concentration

V₁ = Volume of stock to use

C₂ = Desired final concentration

V₂ = Desired final volume

Worked Examples

Example 1: Diluting concentrated DNA

You have DNA at 80 ng/µL. You want 50 µL at 20 ng/µL for PCR setup.

C₁ = 80 ng/µL

V₁ = ? (what we're solving for)

C₂ = 20 ng/µL

V₂ = 50 µL

80 × V₁ = 20 × 50

80 × V₁ = 1000

V₁ = 1000 ÷ 80 = 12.5 µL

Mix: 12.5 µL DNA stock + 37.5 µL elution buffer = 50 µL at 20 ng/µL

Example 2: Making working stocks

You have DNA at 45 ng/µL. You want to make 100 µL at 10 ng/µL.

C₁ = 45 ng/µL

V₁ = ?

C₂ = 10 ng/µL

V₂ = 100 µL

45 × V₁ = 10 × 100

45 × V₁ = 1000

V₁ = 1000 ÷ 45 = 22.2 µL

Mix: 22.2 µL DNA stock + 77.8 µL elution buffer = 100 µL at 10 ng/µL

Example 3: Determining how much template to add when DNA is dilute

You have DNA at 5 ng/µL. You need 25 ng total in your PCR reaction. How much volume?

Needed: 25 ng

Concentration: 5 ng/µL

Volume = Amount ÷ Concentration = 25 ng ÷ 5 ng/µL = 5 µL

Add 5 µL of your DNA to PCR reaction (instead of standard 1 µL)

Example 4: Serial dilutions for very concentrated DNA

You have DNA at 200 ng/µL. You want to make 20 ng/µL (final) but you also want to save a 50 ng/µL intermediate stock.

Step 1: Make 50 ng/µL intermediate
200 ng/µL × V₁ = 50 ng/µL × 100 µL

V₁ = 25 µL DNA + 75 µL buffer = 100 µL at 50 ng/µL

Step 2: Make 20 ng/µL working stock from intermediate
50 ng/µL × V₁ = 20 ng/µL × 50 µL

V₁ = 20 µL intermediate + 30 µL buffer = 50 µL at 20 ng/µL


Quality Requirements for Sanger Sequencing

After successful PCR in Lab, you will prepare your COI amplicons for Sanger sequencing. The sequencing facility has strict requirements.

Pre-Sequencing Quality Control

1. PCR Product Concentration: 2. PCR Product Purity: 3. PCR Product Integrity:

Cleanup Methods

ExoSAP-IT: Column Cleanup (Zymo DNA Clean & Concentrator): Gel Extraction:

Sequencing Submission Requirements

UC Riverside Genomics Core (example): Data Expected:

Visual: Expected Gel Electrophoresis Patterns

Successful Genomic DNA Extraction

 Ladder Sample
 | |

10 kb --- ===== ← Sharp band >20 kb (HMW genomic DNA)

5 kb ---

3 kb ---

1 kb ---

500 bp ---

Interpretation: High molecular weight DNA, intact

Degraded Genomic DNA

 Ladder Sample
 | |

10 kb ---::::

5 kb ---:::: ← Smear from 10 kb down to <1 kb

3 kb ---::::

1 kb ---::::

500 bp ---::

Interpretation: DNases active, DNA fragmented

Successful PCR

 Ladder Sample
 | |

1 kb ---

750 bp --- ===== ← Single sharp band at 712 bp (COI)

500 bp ---

250 bp ---

Interpretation: Specific amplification, ready for sequencing

Failed PCR - No Product

 Ladder Sample
 | |

1 kb ---

750 bp ---

500 bp --- (nothing visible)

250 bp ---

Interpretation: No amplification - check template quality/quantity

Failed PCR - Primer Dimers

 Ladder Sample
 | |

1 kb ---

750 bp ---

500 bp ---

250 bp ---

100 bp ---::::: ← Smear/band at 50-100 bp

50 bp ---

Interpretation: Primers annealing to each other, not template

Failed PCR - Non-Specific Amplification

 Ladder Sample
 | |

1 kb --- ===

750 bp --- ===== ← Multiple bands (including correct size)

500 bp --- ===

250 bp --- ==

Interpretation: Primers annealing to wrong targets; lower annealing temp


Team Comparison: Magnetic vs. SPRI Results

In your lab report, you will compare magnetic bead extraction (BioDynami) with column extraction (Zymo). Here is what to analyze:

Data to Collect

For each sample:

1. Qubit concentration (ng/µL)

2. NanoDrop concentration (ng/µL)

3. A260/A280 ratio

4. A260/A230 ratio

5. Total yield (concentration × volume)

6. PCR success (yes/no, band intensity)

7. Sequencing quality (Phred score, read length)

Hypotheses to Test

Hypothesis 1: Magnetic beads yield higher DNA concentration than columns Hypothesis 2: Magnetic beads produce higher molecular weight DNA Hypothesis 3: Both methods produce PCR-quality DNA Hypothesis 4: Purity ratios differ between methods

Statistical Analysis

Compare means using t-test:
Null hypothesis: Mean concentration (beads) = Mean concentration (columns)

Alternative: Mean concentration (beads) ≠ Mean concentration (columns)

Significance level: α = 0.05

Example dataset (n=10 per group):

Literature on QC Standards

Published Guidelines

1. Genomic DNA Quality for NGS (Simbolo et al., 2013): 2. PCR Template Requirements (Lorenz, 2012): 3. Sanger Sequencing Submission (Eurofins Genomics, 2023):

Mosquito-Specific Considerations

Lawrence et al. (2019) - "Comparison of DNA extraction methods for mosquitoes": Kumar et al. (2007) - "DNA barcodes for Indian mosquitoes":

Key Takeaways

Quality is Multi-Dimensional

DNA quality is not just one number. It is the combination of:

All three must be adequate for your application.

Application Determines Requirements

Troubleshooting Requires Understanding Mechanisms

When experiments fail:

1. Measure all three quality parameters

2. Identify which parameter is out of spec

3. Understand the molecular cause

4. Apply targeted solution

Do not blindly re-extract. Understand what went wrong and fix that specific problem.

Method Choice Matters

Magnetic beads and columns both work, but excel at different applications:

Choose the method that matches your downstream application.


Connection to Lab Lab Activities

In lab, you will:

1. Measure DNA quality comprehensively

- Qubit for concentration

- NanoDrop for purity ratios

- Gel for integrity (if time permits)

2. Make decisions based on quality metrics

- Dilute if too concentrated

- Adjust template volume if too dilute

- Troubleshoot based on purity ratios

3. Compare extraction methods

- Analyze team data (beads vs. columns)

- Statistical comparison of yield and purity

- Discuss which method is "better" for your application

4. Optimize PCR based on DNA quality

- Use Qubit concentration for template calculations

- Add BSA if protein contamination suspected

- Dilute if inhibitors suspected

Remember: Quality control is not a checkbox. It is a diagnostic tool that tells you whether to proceed, optimize, or troubleshoot.
Document prepared for ENTM201L - General Entomology Laboratory UC Riverside, Department of Entomology Fall 2025

Scientific Literature References

This module is supported by peer-reviewed scientific literature on DNA quality assessment, purity metrics, and optimization strategies for molecular biology applications.

View Complete References →