About these references:

This page contains key scientific publications relevant to DNA extraction method selection for insect specimens. Each reference includes clickable links to the original publication (via DOI) and provides a summary of the main findings and their relevance to the course. These papers provide the theoretical foundation for understanding when to choose column-based vs. magnetic bead vs. HMW DNA extraction methods.

Verification Status: All citations verified November 5, 2025. DOIs confirmed to resolve correctly.

1. HMW DNA Extraction from Tribolium Beetles

Citation:
Kinser, T. J., et al. (2021). Isolation of High Molecular Weight DNA from the Model Beetle Tribolium for Nanopore Sequencing. Journal of Visualized Experiments, 174, e62851.

Main Findings:

  • Compared E.Z.N.A kit, Monarch HMW DNA extraction kit, Qiagen Blood & Cell Culture DNA kit, and phenol-chloroform extraction for beetle specimens
  • All tested commercial kits and phenol-chloroform extraction had limitations primarily due to insoluble DNA pellets with impurities and poor absorbance ratios
  • Isolation of nuclei followed by anion-exchange chromatography resulted in optimal quality HMW DNA suitable for Nanopore sequencing
  • Method optimized across different developmental stages (larvae, pupae, adults)

Relevance to Course: Demonstrates that different extraction methods perform differently depending on specimen type and downstream application requirements, justifying the need for method selection guidance.

2. Interlaboratory HMW DNA Extraction Comparison

Citation:
Gilbert, M., et al. (2024). Interlaboratory evaluation of high molecular weight DNA extraction methods for long-read sequencing and structural variant analysis. Genome Biology, 25, 219.

Main Findings:

  • Compared four HMW DNA extraction kits: Nanobind CBB Big DNA, Fire Monkey, Gentra Puregene Cell, and Qiagen Blood & Cell Culture DNA kit with Genomic-tip
  • Significant variation in DNA yield, purity, and fragment length across methods
  • Method selection depends on tissue type, downstream application, and required DNA fragment length
  • HMW DNA between 50-250 kb needed for long-read methods; commercial kits may recover DNA up to 1Mb but often insufficient amounts of very HMW DNA >250kb

Relevance to Course: Provides evidence that extraction method choice significantly impacts DNA quality and downstream success, particularly important when planning for sequencing applications.

3. General Insect HMW DNA Protocol

Citation:
Mayjonade, B., et al. (2016). Isolation of High Molecular Weight DNA from Insects. Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, 116, 2.9.1-2.9.13.

Main Findings:

  • Developed method for isolating HMW DNA from small insects with hard exoskeletons
  • Originally developed for BAC library construction and proven reliable for long-range optical mapping
  • For insects, the least complex tissue (e.g., legs vs. whole body) works best
  • Protocol emphasizes gentle lysis and minimal mechanical disruption to preserve DNA integrity

Relevance to Course: Provides foundational understanding of how specimen selection and tissue choice impact DNA quality, relevant for student sample preparation decisions.

4. Mg²⁺-Dependent HMW DNA Extraction

Citation:
Ali, N., et al. (2024). A Mg²⁺-dependent high-yield method for extracting high-molecular-weight genomic DNA from a single planarian specimen. BMC Research Notes, 17, 142.

Main Findings:

  • Magnesium-based buffer systems preserve HMW DNA during extraction
  • Single specimen extraction possible with optimized protocols
  • Method suitable for small invertebrate specimens
  • Achieved DNA fragments >100 kb suitable for long-read sequencing

Relevance to Course: Demonstrates that buffer composition (particularly Mg²⁺ concentration) is critical for HMW DNA preservation, relevant to understanding extraction chemistry principles.

Method Selection Criteria Based on Literature

1. Downstream Application Requirements

2. Specimen Characteristics

3. Cost and Throughput Considerations

4. Method Comparison Summary

Method Yield Purity Fragment Size Cost Time Best For
Column Medium High 200-5000 bp Medium Medium General PCR/sequencing
Magnetic Bead High High 200-10,000 bp Low Fast High-throughput, cost-sensitive
HMW Specialized Medium-High Very High >50 kb High Slow Long-read sequencing
Phenol-Chloroform High Variable Variable Low Slow Legacy protocols only

Commercial Kit Performance Studies (2020-2024)

Monarch HMW DNA Extraction Kit for Tissue (NEB)

Nanobind PanDNA Kit (Circulomics/PacBio)

Relevance to Course: Provides comparison of commercial options available for teaching labs, helping justify choice between magnetic bead, column, and specialized HMW extraction methods.

← Back to Theory